Clinician-developed content
Educational material should be developed and reviewed by clinicians with expertise relevant to palliative care. Named reviewers will be recorded when the review process is complete.
Trust through transparency
Clinical Quality
How PalliACT content is developed.
This is a prototype. The governance process below describes the intended quality model. Sample lessons, translations and narration are awaiting formal review; no accreditation or endorsement is claimed.
Evidence informed
Content should be grounded in recognised guidance, relevant standards and appropriate evidence. Learning resources will identify their sources and review dates.
Translation quality
Translations should undergo structured checks for meaning, clarity and cultural appropriateness, including fluent-speaker review. The Tamil demonstration is sample translated content.
Transparent use of AI
The prototype links to the supplied Spotify recording and uses prepared assistant responses. The assistant does not call a live AI service. Future uses of AI will be disclosed.
Version control
Each learning resource will carry a version, review status and planned review date. Changes should be tracked before revised material is released.
Educational scope
PalliACT is an education platform and does not replace professional clinical assessment, local policies or escalation procedures.
Example governance record
Recognising the last days of life
Version1.0 · Demonstration draft
Review statusPending clinical review
Example review dateSeptember 2026
Example next reviewSeptember 2027
These dates illustrate the future review record. They do not indicate a completed clinical review.
Background reading: NHS · Changes in the last hours and days of life